Talk abstract:
Two Problems in Drug Design: Additivity Principles and Conformational
Search Strategies
Ken Dill, Univ. of California at San Francisco
Models of the folding and binding in biomolecules are usually
based on certain assumptions of additivities among free energies.
For example, QSAR methods assume group additivities of free
energies, and folding and docking algorithms assume free energies
can be decomposed into terms for hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic
interactions, van der Waals interactions, etc. Are these assumptions
valid? Few methods have been available to test such assumptions.
We have been developing models that are useful for testing additivity
assumptions. The same kinds of models have been useful for setting
standards for testing conformational search methods. Such modelling
can be useful for indicating how to repair the flaws in current
energy models and search strategies.
Back to Workshop
Schedule
1996-1997
Mathematics in High Performance Computing
|