Campuses:

causal inference

Friday, November 9, 2018 - 11:10am - 11:40am
Edward McFowland (University of Minnesota, Twin Cities)
In the recent literature on estimating heterogeneous treatment effects, each proposed method makes its own set of restrictive assumptions about the intervention’s effects and which subpopulations to explicitly estimate. Moreover, the majority of the literature provides no mechanism to identify which subpopulations are the most affected–beyond manual inspection–and provides little guarantee on the correctness of the identified subpopulations.
Thursday, September 14, 2017 - 2:00pm - 2:45pm
Eric Laber (North Carolina State University)
A treatment regime formalizes personalized medicine as a function from individual patient characteristics to a recommended treatment. A high-quality treatment regime can improve patient outcomes while reducing cost, resource consumption, and treatment burden. Thus, there is tremendous interest in estimating treatment regimes from observational and randomized studies. However, the development of treatment regimes for application in clinical practice requires the long-term, joint effort of statisticians and clinical scientists.
Thursday, September 14, 2017 - 2:45pm - 3:15pm
David Vock (University of Minnesota, Twin Cities)
Patients awaiting cadaveric organ transplantation face a difficult decision if offered a low-quality organ: accept the organ or remain on the waiting list and hope a better organ is offered in the future. A dynamic treatment regime (DTR) for transplantation is a rule that determines whether a patient should decline an offered organ. Existing methods can estimate the effect of DTRs on survival outcomes, but these were developed for applications where treatment is abundantly available.
Subscribe to RSS - causal inference