Main navigation
|
Main content
Go to the U of M home page
OneStop
myU
Search U of M Web sites
College of Science and Engineering
HOME
»
PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES
» Public Lectures
PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES
Annual Thematic Program »
Postdoctoral Fellowships »
Hot Topics and Special »
Public Lectures »
New Directions »
PI Programs »
Math Modeling »
Seminars »
Be an Organizer »
Annual »
Hot Topics »
PI Summer »
PI Conference »
Applying to Participate »
New Directions Program
New Directions Short Course
Invariant Objects in Dynamical Systems and their Applications
June 20-July 1, 2011
Program Application
Maps
Live Streaming
Photo Gallery
Abstracts and Talk Materials
Part I: For each question, please select the ONE response that most closely corresponds to your current opinion.
1.
The number of course participants was appropriate.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3 - Agree
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
2.
There was adequate time for speaker/ participant interaction.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3 - Agree
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
3.
The content of the short course met my expectations.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3 - Agree
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
4.
The presentations helped me gain a better understanding of new or future research directions.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3 - Agree
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
5.
I would recommend an IMA short course to a colleague.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3 - Agree
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
Part II: The information below helps the IMA to document and understand the workshop’s impact on the development of contacts and collaborations by participants.
6.
What is your employment sector? Please indicate one.
1. Academia
2. Government Laboratory
3. Corporation
4. Other, please indicate
7.
What is your gender?
1. Female
2. Male
8.
My interaction with other participants was useful in fostering networking.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3 - Agree
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
9.
The facilities were appropriate.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3 - Agree
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
10.
The format of the short course (morning, afternoon, weekend sessions) was appropriate.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3 - Agree
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
11.
What one change could enhance the quality of your experience at the short course
12.
If you are in academia, what is your academic status? Please indicate one.
1. assistant professor
2. associate professor
3. full professor
4. Postdoc
5. Graduate student
13.
How would you assess the impact of the short course? Will you work on new problems as a result? Did you learn something new?
14.
What plans do you have to follow-up on the course? New courses? New topics?
15.
If you are in a field other than mathematics, what is your primary discipline? Please indicate one.
1. Engineering
2. Computer Sciences
3. Physical Sciences
4. Life Sciences
5. Other, please indicate
16.
Other thoughts or comments.
17.
How did you learn about this course?
Validation Code*:
Name(optional):
Go
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer
Last modified on October 06, 2011
Twin Cities Campus:
Parking & Transportation
Maps & Directions
Directories
Contact U of M
Privacy